Papua Conflict Reconciliation Model and Strategies
Abstract
At a glance, the Papuan conflict is a vertical conflict that has lasted more than 50 years. The main cause of this conflict is the desire for “Free Papua” which is supported by the Free Papua Movement (OPM). Conflicts also escalated over the issue of race and discrimination against Papuan students in Surabaya and Malang in August 2019. Negotiation is the Indonesian government's best option for resolving disputes in Papua. The main purpose of this article is to find the best solution for dispute resolution in Papua in terms of the terms that must be carried out and the negotiation process. This study uses a qualitative methodology to investigate social phenomena in society that occur naturally without engineering or laboratory work. This approach provides descriptive data in the form of descriptive or verbal words that describe conditions, situations, or certain different variables. The data collection technique is to use a literature search to obtain the required data. As a result, the Papua conflict negotiation process involved internal parties (central/regional government, KKB/OPM, traditional/religious leaders, civil society) and external parties (freeport), and became the main demand. Indicates that it is an independent Papua. Negotiations have been time consuming and faced many obstacles, but we continue to strive to reach a mutually beneficial solution. Dialogue between Jakarta and Papua should better reflect the cultural values of the Papuan people.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, A. (2009). Social Psychology. Rineka Cipta.
Anderson, Bobby. (2015). Papua Insecurities: State's Failure in The Indonesian Periphery. Washington : East-WestC enter.
Ananta, Aris. Utami, Dwi Retno Wilujeng Wahyu and Handayani, Nur Budi. (2016). "Statistics on Ethnic Diversity in The Land of Papua, Indonesia.". Asia and The Pacific Policy studies, 3(3), 458-474. Doi: 10.1002/app5.143
Basrowi and Kelvin. (2008). Understanding Qualitative Research. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.
Center for Humanitarian Dialogue. (2011). Conflict management in Indonesia - An analysis of conflicts in Maluku, Papua and Poso. Retrieved fromhttp://www.hdcentre.org/uploads/tx_news/64BahasaIndonesiaversion.pdf
Hero. (2010). Conflict and Conflict Management. Theory, Application, and Research. Salemba Humanika.
Firdausi, FA (2019). History of West Papua's Independence from the Netherlands & Join NKRI. Retrieved December 25, 2019, from https://tirto.id/sejarah-kemerdekaan-papua-barat-dari-belanda-join-nkri-egyR
Firmanto, T. (2012). Papua Special Autonomy; Dynamics and Solutions to Solve it - Kompasiana.com. Retrieved December 26, 2019, from https://www.kompasiana.com/taufik.firmanto/551017d48133117436bc61ae/otonomi-specific-papua-dinamika-dan-solution-pemecahannya.
Fisher, Simon, et al. (2001). Managing Conflict: Skills & Strategies for Action. The British Council. Jakarta.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods. Rosdakarya Youth: Bandung.
Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman. (2000). Conflict Resolution Handbook: Theory and Practice, Hunger and Wheelen (2012:29)
Olson, David., & DeFrain, J. (2003). Marriages and Families: Intimacy, Diversity and Strengths. McGraw Hill.
Pruitt, Dean G. and Jeffrey Z. Rubin. (2009). Social Conflict Theory. Student Library: Yogyakarta.
Stephanie K. Marrus, quoted by Sukristono (200131)
Wahyudi. (2011). Conflict Management in Organizations. CV Alfabeta: Bandung. Al-Rahab, Amiruddin. (2006). “Military Operations in Papua: Fence Eating Plants?”, LIPI Political Journal, 3(1). 3-23. Doi: 10.14203/jpp.v3i1.420
Yannizar, et al. (2020). Analysis of Good Corporate Governance, Free Cash Flow, Leverage towards Earning Management, and Shareholder Wealth in Service Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal).P. 2567j-2567v.
Copyright (c) 2021 Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).