Against Self-ownership: A Philosophical Reflection

  • Qusthan Firdaus University of Multimedia Nusantara, Serpong, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/konfrontasi2.v8i1.10
Keywords: Self-Ownership; Libertarian; rights; property; slavery; God

Abstract

This paper argues that the libertarians simply cut off the contingency (between not-yet-persons and persons) into time-slice account. They do not want to deal with a problem such as: how could the structure of Self-Ownership (SO) embed in persons? Indeed, the libertarians arbitrarily ignore who the owner of not-yet-persons is if a child is not a person yet. On the other hand, if God confers people’s property in person, it consequently means that a believer of SO is supposed to also believe in God. Insofar as a believer of SO cannot explain what the source of SO is, he needs to rely on a Lockeian explanation where God confers human with a property in person. There are two general libertarian reasons for this. First of all, the libertarian notion of slavery, as Cohen encounters it. Secondly, as Narveson conceives, since each individual has separate life, therefore every interaction between individuals is supposed to be based on mutual benefits. Therefore, the more appropriate way to encounter the thesis of SO is by cutting the bridge between the notion of owning self and a matter of moral right. Instead of cutting the bridge, Cohen widens his rejection by proposing another institution. Nevertheless, Cohen does nothing to explain what the structure of the bridge consist in and what the foundation for such a bridge is.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arneson, Richard J. (2011). Side Constraints, Lockean Individual Rights, and the Moral Basis of Libertarianism. In The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, edited by Ralf M. Bader and John Meadowcroft, 15-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blackburn, Simon. (1994). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Brown, James Robert and Fehige, Yiftach. (2011). “Thought Experiments”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; available [online] http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/thoughtexperiment/; [19 July 2012].
Cohen, G. A. (1995). Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graves, Elizabeth E. (1971). "The Ever-Victorius Buffalo: How the Minangkabau of Indonesia solved their "colonial question." Ph.D., University of Wisconsin.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by Allen W. Wood, translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jeske, Diane. (1996). "Libertarianism, Self-Ownership, and Motherhood." Social Theory and Practice 22: 137-160.
Miller, Jr., Fred D. (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Narveson, Jan. (1998). Libertarianism Vs. Marxism: Reflections on G. A. Cohen's SO, Freedom and Equality. The Journal of Ethics 2: 1-26.
______________. (2010). Property and Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 27: 101-134.
Nozick, Robert. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Olson, Eric T. (2010). Personal Identity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; available [online] http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/identity-personal; [19 July 2012].
Steiner, Hillel. (2000). Original Rights and Just Redistribution (1994). In Left-libertarianism and Its Critics, edited by Peter Vallentyne and Hiller Steiner. 74-121. Hampshire: Palgrave.
______________. (2006). "Self-ownership and Conscription." In The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in honour of G. A. Cohen, edited by Christine Sypnowich, 88-101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vallentyne, Peter. (2011). Nozick's libertarian theory of justice. In The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, edited by Ralf M. Bader and John Meadowcroft, 145-167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_________________. (2012). Libertarianism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. available [online] http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/libertarianism/; [1 August 2012].
Waldron, Jeremy. (1990). The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wenar, Leif. (2011). Rights, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; [Online] http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/; [9 October 2012].
Published
2019-01-01
How to Cite
Firdaus, Q. (2019). Against Self-ownership: A Philosophical Reflection. Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi Dan Perubahan Sosial, 6(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.33258/konfrontasi2.v8i1.10
Issue
Vol 6 No 1 (2019): Konfrontasi, January
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2019 Qusthan Firdaus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).