About Some Actual Problems of the Methodology of Research of State Legal Phenomena
Abstract
This scientific article is devoted to the consideration of some methodological problems of the study of state and legal phenomena. The main purpose of the work is to draw the attention of the scientific community to those general theoretical methodological issues that are ambiguously solved by scientists and which are important for legal science. To achieve this goal during the study, the following tasks were solved: 1) substantiate the importance and necessity of the general philosophical method; 2) to argue the unacceptability of the religious and moral approach to the study of state and legal reality; 3) dialectically assess such a methodological principle as the principle of scientific pluralism. In conclusion, it is concluded that, firstly, that general philosophical methods, in particular and especially the method of dialectical and historical materialism, which form the methodological basis for the scientific study of state-legal phenomena, should not be ignored, because they reveal the most general laws of the movement of human thought to the truth, concentrating all the most important and essential that is contained in other methods; secondly, the religious philosophy of believers should not be included in the potential of the methodology of cognition of state and legal reality; thirdly, the methodological principle of scientific pluralism must have appropriate boundaries.
Downloads
References
[2]. Tarasov Nikolay Nikolaevich. Methodological problems of legal science. Yekaterinburg: Publishing house of the Humanitarian University, 2001.Pp. 3, 29.
[3]. Lazarev Valery Vasilievich, Lipen Sergey Vasilievich. Theory of State and Law: Textbook), Moscow: Yurayt. Pp.22, 132.
[4]. Pyanov Nikolai Andreevich. Consulting on the theory of state and law: textbook. Irkutsk, Publishing house of the Irkutsk state. University, 2010. Pp. 19-20.
[5]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich, Senin Igor Nikolaevich. Methodology of the theory of state and law: textbook) Omsk: Omsk Economic Institute. P.49.
[6]. Kokhanovsky Valery Pavlovich, Leshkevich Tatiana Gennadievna, Matyash Tamara Petrovna, Fatkhi Tatiana Borisovna. Fundamentals of the philosophy of science: textbook. Rostov n / a: Phoenix, 2010.P. 318.
[7]. Kravets Alexander Samuilovich. Methodology of Science. Voronezh: Voronezh University, 1991.Pp. 13, 15.
[8]. Zhukov Vyacheslav Nikolaevich. Philosophy of law: textbook. Moscow: World of Philosophy, Algorithm, 2019.Pp.37, 39.
[9]. Vlasenko Nikolai Alexandrovich. Methodological problems of modern theory of law // Journal of Russian law. 2019.P.8.
[10]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. On the hermeneutic method in jurisprudence. // Bulletin of Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky. Right. 2020.T.17.No. 1. Pp.15-26.
[11]. Syrykh Vladimir Mikhailovich. The hermeneutic circle as a methodological dead end // Modern research methods in jurisprudence / ed. Nikolai Ignatievich Matuzov, Alexander Vasilyevich Malko. Saratov: Publishing house of the Saratov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2007.Pp. 183-235.
[12]. Chestnov Ilya Lvovich. Legal Understanding in the Postmodern Era: Monograph: Publishing House of the St. Petersburg Institute for Foreign Economic Relations, Economics and Law, 2006.P. 272.
[13]. Kozlikhin Igor Yurievich. On non-traditional approaches to law // Jurisprudence. 2006. No. 1.P. 31.
[14]. General theory of law: a course of lectures / ed. Vladimir Konstantinovich Babaev. N. Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod High School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1993. P.6.
[15]. Baranov Vladimir Mikhailovich, Pershin Vladimir Borisovich, Baranova Marina Vladimirovna. The place and role of the method of materialistic dialectics in legal research // Philosophy of law. 2007. No. 3. P.10.
[16]. Graham Lauren. Natural science, philosophy and the science of human behavior in the Soviet Union. M .: Politizdat, 1991. P.15.
[17]. History and methodology of legal science: textbook / ed. Vitaly Viktorovich Sorokin. Barnaul: New format, 2016.Pp. 12-13, 14.
[18]. Theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Orest Vladimirovich Martyshin. M .: Norma, 2007.Pp. 31-39.
[19]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. On the problems of the general theory of law (based on the analysis of the textbook for universities "History and methodology of legal science" / under the editorship of Vitaly Viktorovich Sorokin. // Agrarian and Land Law. 2018. No. 5. Pp.133-147.
[20]. Martyshin Orest Vladimirovich. Philosophy of law: textbook. M .: Prospect, 2017. P. 311.
[21]. Goyman-Kalinsky Igor Vladimirovich, Ivanets Galina Ivanovna, Chervonyuk Vladimir Ivanovich. Elementary principles of the general theory of law: textbook / ed. V. I. Chervonyuk. M.: KolosS, 2003.P. 24.
[22]. Philosophical Dictionary / ed. Mark Moiseevich Rosenthal. Moscow: Political Literature Publishing House, 1975.P. 317.
[23]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. Theory of state and law as a science // Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich, Kozhenevsky Victor Boleslavovich, Rybakov Vladimir Alekseevich. Theory of state and law: textbook / otv. ed. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. M .: Prospect, 2020. P.11.
[24]. Behruz Khashmatullah. Comparative jurisprudence: textbook), Moscow: TransLit, 2008. P. 53.
[25]. Syrykh Vladimir Mikhailovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M .: Justicinform, 2001.P. 492.
[26]. Serkov Petr Pavlovich. Legal relationship (Theory and practice of modern legal regulation): a monograph in 3 parts. Moscow: Norma, 2018.Part 1.Pp. 27, 29.
[27]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich, Karavaev Alexander Fedorovich, Zverev Vadim Olegovich. The status of positive legal responsibility in the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the general theory of law // Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies. 2018. No. 3. Pp.88-94.
[28]. Lyubashits Valentin Yakovlevich, Smolensky Mikhail Borisovich, Shepelev Vladimir Ivanovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. Rostov n / a: Phoenix, 2006. P. 462.
[29]. Sorokin Vitaly Viktorovich. The theory of legal responsibility: textbook. Barnaul: Altai State Publishing House. University, 2017.Pp. 45-46.
Copyright (c) 2020 Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).